The most detrimental aspect of being an expert witness is to have acquired specialised training, study or experience, as outlined in item 3.12 of APES 215. Additionally Rasmussen and Leauanae (2004) highlights that years of prior experience in forensic cases, training and education are the most important characteristic of an expert.
In additional to such training, study and experience, research has highlighted that more skills are required and a only a certain type of mindset is suitable. Rasmussen and Leauanae (2004) have highlighted that charisma is necessary to be a good expert. Additionally Hoffman, Finney, Cox and Cooper (2007, p.15) have said that appearing in court to present an expert opinion requires an attitude and approach without being either too aggresive or over-confident.
In reference to Rasmussen and Leauanae and Hoffman, et al’s
finding, Korney (2006) highlights that forensic accountants are more like
sleuths and that such a mindset, which other specialisations such as audit and
tax lack, are essential to becoming a successful forensic accountant and
subsequently an effective expert. Additionally DiGabriele (2008) has
highlighted in an empirical study that the key skills to being a forensic
accountant include both verbal and non-verbal communication along with
detective analysis and critical thinking skills. Finally Steward (2008) found
that knowledge and an understanding of the law and court system and essential
in an expert in addition to being able to communicate complex accounting data
clearly and concisely to the court.
Singleton, Singleton, Bologna and Lindquist (2006) highlight personal qualities which forensic accountants and expert witnesses require, these are; team worker, trustworthiness and integrity, professionalism, quality of work, professional demeanor, the ability to easily explain technical issues and mannerisms and idiosyncrasies.
Singleton, Singleton, Bologna and Lindquist (2006) highlight personal qualities which forensic accountants and expert witnesses require, these are; team worker, trustworthiness and integrity, professionalism, quality of work, professional demeanor, the ability to easily explain technical issues and mannerisms and idiosyncrasies.
Another key
aspect of being an expert witness is to understand what the key duties are.
APESB (2008) have highlighted in item 5.4 of APES 215 the specific duties which
apply to providing an expert witness service. The summary of these duties is
outlined below:
·
The paramount duty
to the court which overrides any duties to the client or employer;
·
A duty to assist
the court on matters relevant to the member’s area of expertise in an objective
and unbiased manner;
·
A duty not to be an
advocate for a party;
·
A duty to make it
clear to court when a particular question or issues fall outside the member’s
expertise.
Further Reading:
Accounting
Professional and Ethical Standards Board. (2008). APES 215 Forensic Accounting Services, item 3.12 – Professional
competence and due care. Retrieved from: http://www.publicaccountants.org.au/media/32890/apes%20215%20standard_1.pdf
DiGabriele,
J. (2008). An empirical investigation of the relevant skills of forensic
accountants. Journal of Education for
Business, 83(6), 331-338. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/202824008
Hoffman, R., Finney, W., Cox, P., & Cooper, K. (2007). The forensic accountant as an expert witness: a basic guide for forensic accouning. Sydney, NSW: CCH Australia Limited
Korney, A.
(2006). Accountants’ day in court. Accounting
Today, 20(15), 1 and 30. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/234454856
New
standards for forensic accountants. (2009). Intheblack,
79(2), 45. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/211279933
Singleton, T., Singleton, A., Bolognia, J., & Lindquist, R. (2006). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting (3rd Ed). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Rasmussen, D., & Leauanae, J. (2004). Expert witness qualifications and selection. Journal of Financial Crime, 12 (2), 165-171. Doi: 10.1108/13590790510624954
Rasmussen, D., & Leauanae, J. (2004). Expert witness qualifications and selection. Journal of Financial Crime, 12 (2), 165-171. Doi: 10.1108/13590790510624954
Stewart, F.
(2008, October 14). Accountants eye forensics. The Advertiser. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/354927167
No comments:
Post a Comment