Week 2
“The use of COBIT 4.1 (or any other IT Governance framework) simply creates a great deal of work for an organisation and yet may provide little benefit. (In light of what you have learnt, intuitively know, and/or have read to date on the four domains of ITG and the online environment businesses operate in, discuss this statement.)”
“The use of COBIT 4.1 (or any other IT Governance framework) simply creates a great deal of work for an organisation and yet may provide little benefit. (In light of what you have learnt, intuitively know, and/or have read to date on the four domains of ITG and the online environment businesses operate in, discuss this statement.)”
I have
been thinking about the importance and application of the COBIT 4.1 framework in light of
the Brisbane floods of 2011. Van Grembergen and De Haes (2008), have identified
that COBIT provides a generic criteria which can be applied to any organisation.
COBIT 4.1 recommends four domains which are universal and the set of control
objectives provide an outline of procedures for any organisation. However
Rudman (2008) highlights that COBIT can be resource intensive and costly to
implement.
For those
businesses affected by the floods, many were struggling after their IT systems
were destroyed (Rasmussen, 2011). Contingency planning could have minimised
the loss as a result of the floods. Control objective DS4 – Ensure Continuous Service, (COBIT
4.1 2007) can be applied by businesses to prepare for disruptions to their
daily trading. DS4 highlights the requirements of contingency planning in case of natural disaster and backing up. My mother’s workplace was affected by
the floods and while only minor damage occurred, they had to cease operations
and evacuate their IT equipment to ensure the safety of their data. In contrast
other affected businesses suffered losses on average of $834,992 in lost
inventory, income and productivity (Moore, 2011). Therefore a framework for
governance should be implemented as I believe the consequences are costly compared to the costs of implementation.
Reference
List:
COBIT 4.1. (2007). COBIT 4.1:
Framework, control objectives, management guidelines and maturity models.
Retrieved from www.isaca.org
Moore, T. (2011, February 3). Flood losses batter Brisbane businesses. Brisbane times. Retrieved from: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/flood-losses-batter-brisbane-businesses-20110203-1aff9.html
Rasmussen, D. (2011, January 19). Free and discounted IT gets flood-hit Queensland businesses back online. Intrapower.com.au. Retrieved from: http://www.intrapower.com.au/IntraPower_Flood_Press_Release.html
Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes,
S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology. doi:
10.1007/978-0-387-84882-2_5
No comments:
Post a Comment